Jeff Worrell campaigning during Election day A.M. traffic with a sign that states: “This Stop Sign must go” and two campaign signs by his side
Removing the Auman and 126th Stop Sign!
Please note the date of this text.
One year to the day before the 2011 Primary
So what year did the Mayor begin laying the groundwork for the Stop Sign removal?
Mayor Brainard began work to remove stop the sign in 2016 in 2010!
That is right he had the engineering work done in 2010 clearly preparing for a 2011 Stop Sign removal campaign strategy.
So clearly this was on the mayors radar in 2010 for the 2011 campaign. A funny thing happened on the way to the 2011 Primary. The mayor had TWO candidates running against him that he knew would split the vote so he stuck the ACE back up his sleeve to play when he needed it. He needed it in 2015.
For 4 years the Mayor allowed 13,000 cars/day to stop at a sign he intended to remove.
But only when it would help him stay in office for another term.
That is 18,980,000 unnecessary stops and starts. How much fuel was wasted sitting in line. How many sets of brakes is 19,000,000 stops? How much time did you lose for 4 years just so the Mayor had a winning Campaign strategy?
Even a bigger question is how many accidents and how many dollars in property damage resulted from the Mayor’s campaign strategy?
One thought to “How The Auman Dr. Stop Sign won an election; Brainard’s campaign strategy for 2011 works like a charm in 2015 election.”
Comments are closed.